Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

Kaplan et al. identify smooth power-law relationships governing language model performance:

\[L(N) \propto N^{-\alpha_N}, \quad L(C) \propto C^{-\alpha_C}, \quad L(D) \propto D^{-\alpha_D}\]

where $N$ = model parameters, $C$ = training compute, $D$ = dataset size.

Key findings:

  • Performance depends most strongly on scale, not on architectural details (depth vs. width)
  • Model size is the dominant factor for a fixed compute budget
  • Data and compute requirements scale together: undertrained models waste compute
  • The “compute-optimal” model size given a fixed FLOP budget is larger than practitioners typically train

These results were later refined by Chinchilla (Hoffmann et al., 2022), which showed the original paper underweighted data relative to parameters — optimal scaling allocates roughly equal compute to parameters and tokens.




Enjoy Reading This Article?

Here are some more articles you might like to read next:

  • The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of Thought
  • Landscape of Thoughts — Visualizing Where LLM Reasoning Actually Goes
  • Magellan — Guided MCTS for Escaping the Gravity Wells of LLM Creativity
  • PriorZero — Injecting LLM Priors into MuZero-Style World Models at the MCTS Root
  • SuperThoughts — Reasoning Tokens in Superposition